Archive for November, 2009
Below we provide some Google search links to the ctrussell.us site of the writings of Charles Taze Russell in which the words given below appear. The searches may not fully perfect as to desired results, but between the various searches one should be able to find most, if not all, that Russell wrote or said concerning the Freemasons. It is only by taking his words out of context, or by use of imagination and insinuations, that there could be idea assumed that Russell was a member of the Freemasons organization. Please note, however, that just because Russell said something, does not man that we agree with what he said.
This is a preview of
Search Links of Russell’s Works Regarding Freemasons
.
Read the full post (282 words, estimated 1:08 mins reading time)
November 29th, 2009 | Posted in Freemasons, Russell's Writings | 1 Comment
It is being reported that Charles Taze Russell taught that the Christian God was the devil, not Jehovah. The alleged evidence for this is presented with reference to Studies in the Scriptures, Volume 7, The Finished Mystery, page 410. These statements appear to stem from some false statements made by Dr. John Ankerberg and Dr. John Weldon in a book entitled: “Why Is The Doctrine Of The Trinity A Vital Belief For Christians To Understand?” In that book, it is stated:
This is a preview of
The Christian God Not Jehovah? (CTR Wordpress Link)
.
Read the full post (1506 words, estimated 6:01 mins reading time)
November 28th, 2009 | Posted in Hell, Jehovah's witnesses, The Trinity | No Comments
The following are some quotes from Charles Taze Russell concerning his own view of his works, especially as related to whether he considered his works infallible:
No system of theology should be presented, or accepted, which overlooks or omits the most prominent features of Scripture teaching. We trust, however, that a wide distinction will be recognized between the earnest, sober and reverent study of prophecy and other scriptures, in the light of accomplished historic facts, to obtain conclusions which sanctified common sense can approve, and a too common practice of general speculation, which, when applied to divine prophecy, is too apt to give loose rein to wild theory and vague fancy. Those who fall into this dangerous habit generally develop into prophets (?) instead of prophetic students. -
1886; “The Divine Plan of the Ages”, pg. 13
http://www.agsconsulting.com/htdbnon/htdb0068.htm
This is a preview of
Did Russell Claim Infallibility (CTR Wordpress Link)
.
Read the full post (2306 words, estimated 9:13 mins reading time)
November 28th, 2009 | Posted in Infallibility, Predictions, Prophet | No Comments
This is in further reply to:
http://www.freewebs.com/wwwsoundnessofmindcom/charlestazerussell.htm
Under the subheading of “Some Strange Teachings of C. T. Russell” is listed the teaching of “pyramidology.” The statement is made that certain calculations based on the Great Pyramid were “integrated into the prophecies of Russell.”
Although Russell never used the word “pyramidology,” Russell did believe that the Great Pyramid corroborated the Bible. It has been said that truth is stranger than fiction; this, however, is because of limited perceptions of truth. Thus, unless one actually studies pyramidology, the idea of pyramidology may seem “strange,” just as many non-Christians believe that the idea of God sending a son to die for our sins is “strange,” if their minds have not been conditioned to accept this. Yet, the very fact that Jesus died for our sins is confirmed by the Great Pyramid.
This is a preview of
Strange Teaching of Pryramidology (CTR Wordpress Link)
.
Read the full post (410 words, estimated 1:38 mins reading time)
November 28th, 2009 | Posted in Predictions, Prophet, Pyramidology | No Comments
Many are making all kinds of unsubstantiated claims about Charles Taze Russell. One of the claims that I keep seeing in forums, blogs and websites, is that Russell predicted the end of the world in 1874. Russell never “predicted” anything at all concerning 1874. Until 1876, he did not believe anything at all concerning the year 1874. in 1876, two years after 1874, Russell did come across N. H. Barbour’s presentation that Jesus had already returned invisibly in 1874. Having already concluded that Jesus would not return in a physical body, Russell was interested in what this said. As a result of studying with N. H. Barbour, Russell became convinced that Jesus had already returned in 1874. However, before 1876 he was held not interest in 1874, and certainly never predicted the end of the world in 1874 sometime before he ever accepted 1874 (in 1876, two years after 1874) as being the year of Christ’s return. In other words, how could he “predict” something to happen after it was supposedly to have been predicted to happen?
This is a preview of
Predicted End of the World in 1874? (CTR Wordpress Link)
.
Read the full post (369 words, estimated 1:29 mins reading time)
November 28th, 2009 | Posted in 1874, Christ's Return, Dates, Predictions | No Comments
The claim is made that Russell “introduced occultism into his religion by teaching that the pyramids in Egypt are divine omens.”
Among other false assertions, this false statement appears on Paul Blizard’s site:
http://www.geocities.com/paulblizard/russell.html
The statements appearing on this site have been quoted over and over across many forums on the web, and although many have pointed out the falsity of the statements, the site owner continues to display such statements of deception, thus promoting such false claims. However, almost every sentence on the page states an untruth, putting the matter politely.
November 28th, 2009 | Posted in 1914, Freemasons, Predictions, Pyramidology, Spiritism | No Comments
On the website:
http://www.freewebs.com/wwwsoundnessofmindcom/charlestazerussell.htm
The following is stated concerning Charles Taze Russell
Truth: “A truth presented by Satan himself is just as true as a truth stated by God. . . . Accept truth wherever you find it, no matter what it contradicts” (WT 7/1879, pp. 8-9).
This quotation is from Russell, and it does state a truth. However, taking the quote out of context is evidently designed to lead one to believe that Russell was in some way in agreement with, in service of, the devil. Let us look at the quote in context:
This is a preview of
A Truth Presented by Satan (CTR Wordpress Link)
.
Read the full post (835 words, estimated 3:20 mins reading time)
November 28th, 2009 | Posted in Russell's Writings, Satan | No Comments
On the website:
http://www.freewebs.com/wwwsoundnessofmindcom/charlestazerussell.htm
Brother Russell is being misrepresented as teaching that lying to people you consider to be God’s enemies is justifiable as theocratic “war strategy“. The reference given as proof of such is the Watchtower, June 1, 1960, page 352.
Immediately, most Bible Students realize that whatever was written in 1960 could not have been written by Russell, since Russell died in 1916. Russell never wrote anything to the effect that lying to ones considered to be God’s enemies was something that a consecrated child of God should do. What the writer has done to quote something as being taught by Russell when in actuality Russell never taught such a thing.
November 28th, 2009 | Posted in Spiritual Warfare | No Comments
On the webpage at:
http://www.freewebs.com/wwwsoundnessofmindcom/charlestazerussell.htm
we are being told:
Nelson H. Barbour (1824-1908, NY)–Millerite Adventist taught that the rapture would occur in April, 1878. Paired up with Russell 1876-1881. Influenced Russell by teaching an invisible return of Christ. Split over differences after failed prophecy of Christ�s return in 1844 and debate over Christ�s ransom.
This appears to be saying that Russell split with Barbour over an alleged “failed prophecy” of Christ’s return in 1844. Could be a typo, possibly meant to be 1874. Regardless, Russell was not even born in 1844, so I do not see how he could be having any differences with anyone concerning an alleged failed prophecy concerning Christ’s return in 1844.
There was some difference, however, regarding 1878, not over Christ’s return (which neither was expecting for that year), but over what had happened on that date.
If 1874 was date meant, I believe both Russell and Barbour had agreed, at least until 1878, that Christ had already returned invisibly in 1874. Russell himself never made any predictions concerning either 1844 nor 1874. It was not until two years after 1874 that Russell accepted that Jesus had already returned in 1874. There was no failure concerning that date.
Neither Russell nor Barbour, however, ever claimed to be making any prophecies. Russell disclaimed be a prophet many times, but rather he claimed to be a student of prophecy. Thus there were no “failed prophecies”, not unless one may believe that the Bible itself contains “failed prophecy”.
See:
Russell’s own words regarding his differences with Barbour may be found at:
Filed under: Things You Might Not Know About Charles T. Russell | Tagged: 1844, 1878, Charles Taze Russell, Christ’s return., failed prophecy, N. H. Barbour
Permanent link to this post (291 words, estimated 1:10 mins reading time)
November 28th, 2009 | Posted in 1844, 1874, 1878, N. H. Babour, Predictions | No Comments
The following appeared in the Watch Tower, July 1, 1913:
A CURE FOR SURFACE CANCER
Cancer troubles are becoming more numerous. We know of no remedy for internal cancers except surgery. Even then a cure is doubtful. We have recently learned of a very effective and simple remedy for cancers which show themselves on the surface of the body. We are informed that a physician, after testing this remedy, paid $1,000 for the information, and that he has established a Cancer Hospital which is doing good work. The recipe has come to us free and we are willing to communicate the formula, but to those only who are troubled with surface cancers and who will write to us directly, stating particulars. No fee will be charged, but in order to protect the sufferers, we require a promise that they will not sell the formula to others, nor receive pay for the use of it, nor communicate the formula to anybody. Any one known to be a sufferer can be informed of the terms on which the prescription is obtainable through us.
November 27th, 2009 | Posted in Cancer Cure | No Comments
The Internet is filled with misinformation, misquotes, quotes out of context, false accusations, insinuations, and outright falsehoods about Charles Taze Russell. One website that quotes various religious leaders under the heading: ALL OR NOTHING STATEMENTS (from those that have “the truth”). Some other sites have the same material: [1][2][3][4][5] It becomes clear from many of the quotes given that by saying “all or nothing” the editor of the page means that the one being quoted is supposedly claiming that he or she is to be considered the only channel being used by God to communicate with men. Russell never made such a claim.
This is a preview of
Russell’s Alleged “All or Nothing” Statements
.
Read the full post (1163 words, estimated 4:39 mins reading time)
November 19th, 2009 | Posted in Church Organization, Infallibility, Jehovah's witnesses, Russell's Writings, Rutherford | No Comments
CLICK HERE to search the writings of Russell for the phrase “only channel.” Many claim that Russell taught that he was God’s only channel for truth. This presents a Google search of Russell’s writings for the phrase “only channel.” The claim of “only channel” came from Rutherford of the Jehovah’s Witnesses, not from Charles Taze Russell.
CLICK HERE for another related search on “only authority”. One should note how many times Russell pointed to Jesus, the apostles and the Bible as the “only authority.” He never pointed to himself or his writings as such.
Permanent link to this post (95 words, estimated 23 secs reading time)
November 19th, 2009 | Posted in Church Organization, Infallibility, Jehovah's witnesses, Russell's Writings | 2 Comments
Permanent link to this post (1 word, estimated 0 secs reading time)
November 12th, 2009 | Posted in Bible Students, History, Russell's Writings | No Comments
Permanent link to this post (1 word, estimated 0 secs reading time)
November 8th, 2009 | Posted in Jehovah's witnesses | No Comments
ZION’S
WATCH TOWER
AND
HERALD OF CHRIST’S PRESENCE
Vol. I********** JULY, 1879 ********** No. 1
page 1
SUPPLEMENT TO
Zion’s Watch Tower,
And “Herald of Christ’s Presence.”
==========
PITTSBURGH, PA., JULY 1, 1879.
==========
To the readers of the “HERALD OF THE MORNING,”
DEAR FRIENDS: My connection with the “Herald” having been terminated rather suddenly, and under circumstances which must seem rather remarkable and peculiar to you, I feel it to be a duty both to you and to myself to offer an explanation of the manner of withdrawal and my reasons for so doing. Quite a number who were personally acquainted with me thought there must be more of the story to tell, and I have received a number of letters asking an explanation. To these inquiries and to many unexpressed of similar character, let me offer the following statement:
This is a preview of
Supplement to the First Issue of the Watch Tower
.
Read the full post (5558 words, estimated 22:14 mins reading time)
November 8th, 2009 | Posted in 1874, 1878, Predictions, Ransom Sacrifice, Russell's Writings | 2 Comments
Permanent link to this post (1 word, estimated 0 secs reading time)
November 7th, 2009 | Posted in Pyramidology, Russell's Writings | No Comments
Permanent link to this post (1 word, estimated 0 secs reading time)
November 7th, 2009 | Posted in Russell's Writings, Spiritism | No Comments
CLICK HERE to search Russell’s writings for the phrase “only authority.” The claim is often made that Russell claimed to be the “only authority” to interpret the Bible, often relating the present-day claims of the Jehovah’s Witnesses “central authority” and “Jehovah’s organization” teachings back to Russell. This search shows that Russell considered Jesus and his apostles (through the Bible) as the “only authority” for the church.
Permanent link to this post (67 words, estimated 16 secs reading time)
November 6th, 2009 | Posted in Bible Students, Church Organization, Infallibility, Jehovah's witnesses, Russell's Writings | 1 Comment