Archive for the 'Jehovah's witnesses' Category

Volunteer Racism?

In the March 1, 1900 (page 66, Reprints page 2585) issue of the Watch Tower, the following announcement was made:

RE-ENLISTED VOLUNTEERS! TO ARMS!

———-

The new lot of “Bible vs. Evolution” ammunition is not yet ready, but by March 15 to April 1 we will have plenty of the new ammunition for use where the Bible vs. Evolution has already been distributed. You will like it, we assure you this in advance. It will consist of “Which is the True Gospel?” and “What Say the Scriptures about Hell?” in the shape of a double number of the WATCH TOWER. Get your several squads together and let us have your orders stating (1) the number of white Protestant churches in the district; (2) the average attendance at service which the church members chiefly attend; (3) the number of Volunteers in your squad; (4) to what address would you prefer to have the ammunition sent.

  • Share/Bookmark

Negro Race Supposition

Russell is often depicted as racist who was prejudiced against black people; one of the quotes often presented is one sentence from the the Watch Tower, August 1898, page 230, which reads:

The negro race is supposed to be descended from Ham, whose special degradation  is mentioned in Genesis 9:22,25.

  • Share/Bookmark

The Rock Built Church (temp redirect)

  • Share/Bookmark

The True Church (Sermon by Russell)

We are presenting below the sermon of Charles Taze Russell entitled “The True Church.” This sermon proves that Russell did not believe in sectarianism, and, while not condoing denominationalism, he believed that there could be Christians in all of the denominations that profess to be Christian. As one can see by reading this, Russell certainly did not believe in an organization such as the Jehovah’s Witnesses have today, which they style “Jehovah’s organization.” This sermon may be found on page 120 in the book, Pastor Russell’s Sermons. Please note that the owner of this website does not necessarily agree with all the details of Russell’s conclusions.

  • Share/Bookmark

The Watchtower’s Self-Contradiction About the Ransom (Link to Focus on JWs)

  • Share/Bookmark

Russell’s Pyramid Tomb? (Blogspot Link)

Another video has been posted on YouTube (and on a site) about Charles Taze Russell.

Practically every sentence contains a falsehood, putting it politely.

The video starts by showing a scene of the pyramid monument that stands in the middle of the Watch Tower Society plot of the Rosement Cemetery in Pittsburg. The tone is set by the use of the word “weird” and the manner of presentation. The idea weirdness is focused on by the claim that this pyramid wins “first prize” as being the most weird site in Pennsylvania. Of course, many claim the Bible is weird also, and yes, what is revelealed through the Bible is indeed weird to the unregenerated, and even to the babes in Christ whose minds have not developed beyond the carnal reasoning. — 1 Corinthians 2:6,7,8,14; 3:1.

  • Share/Bookmark

Phrenology and Russell

Phrenology: a psychological theory or analytical method based on the belief that certain mental faculties and character traits are indicated by the configurations of the skull. — Dictionary.com Unabridged; Based on the Random House Dictionary, © Random House, Inc. 2009.

Phrenologist: One versed in phrenology; a craniologist. (Webster, 1913)

Crainology: the science that deals with the size, shape, and other characteristics of human skulls. — — Dictionary.com Unabridged; Based on the Random House Dictionary, © Random House, Inc. 2009.

  • Share/Bookmark

The church in various denominations

Often many make the claim that Russell was the founder of the JWs, and confuse the JWs organization stance as the only true church with Russell. Russell did not believe an earthly “Jehovah’s organization,” as Rutherford and the JWs speak of. In truth Charles Taze Russell was not the founder of the JWs, nor did he believe in such an authoritative organization as the JWs. Russell believed that one can be saved by grace by faith in the blood of Jesus, regardless of denominational affiliation. Russell stated: “the Lord in Heaven records as members of His true Church all the saintly — whether Roman Catholics, Anglican Catholics, Greek Catholics, Baptists, Methodists, Presbyterians, etc. — and none others…. Do we not see that a part of our mistake was in calling the outward organization the Church of Christ, instead of remembering that the Lord alone writes the names of the Church, that He alone reads the hearts, that He alone is the Judge, and that He alone has the right to blot out the names of those who become reprobates? … We must see that the Church is a comparatively small company of saintly footstep followers of Jesus, irrespective of sectarian lines.” And Russell stated: “all who are worshiping any church organization should be warned. See thou do it not.’ These are thy fellow servants. ‘Worship God.’ `Rev. 22:9`.” He further stated: “so far as the true Church is concerned, the only authority in it is the Lord, the Head of the Church, and his Word, and the words of those whom he specially chose to be his mouth-pieces, the apostles.” And, “we believe that in every nation and denomination there are some true saints of God, members therefore of the true Church of God.”

  • Share/Bookmark

The Christian God Not Jehovah? (CTR Wordpress Link)

It is being reported that Charles Taze Russell taught that the Christian God was the devil, not Jehovah. The alleged evidence for this is presented with reference to Studies in the Scriptures, Volume 7, The Finished Mystery, page 410. These statements appear to stem from some false statements made by Dr. John Ankerberg and  Dr. John Weldon  in a book entitled: “Why Is The Doctrine Of The Trinity A Vital Belief For Christians To Understand?”  In that book, it is stated:

  • Share/Bookmark

Russell’s Alleged “All or Nothing” Statements

The Internet is filled with misinformation, misquotes, quotes out of context, false accusations, insinuations, and outright falsehoods about Charles Taze Russell. One website that quotes various religious leaders under the heading: ALL OR NOTHING STATEMENTS (from those that have “the truth”). Some other sites have the same material: [1][2][3][4][5] It becomes clear from many of the quotes given that by saying “all or nothing” the editor of the page means that the one being quoted is supposedly claiming that he or she is to be considered the only channel being used by God to communicate with men. Russell never made such a claim.

  • Share/Bookmark

“Only Channel” (A Google Search of Russell’s Writings)

CLICK HERE to search the writings of Russell for the phrase “only channel.” Many claim that Russell taught that he was God’s only channel for truth. This presents a Google search of Russell’s writings for the phrase “only channel.” The claim of “only channel” came from Rutherford of the Jehovah’s Witnesses, not from Charles Taze Russell.

CLICK HERE for another related search on “only authority”. One should note how many times Russell pointed to Jesus, the apostles and the Bible as the “only authority.” He never pointed to himself or his writings as such.

  • Share/Bookmark

A New Religion? (Blogspot Link)

  • Share/Bookmark

A search of Russell’s writings for “only authority” (Link)

CLICK HERE to search Russell’s writings for the phrase “only authority.” The claim is often made that Russell claimed to be the “only authority” to interpret the Bible, often relating the present-day claims of the Jehovah’s Witnesses “central authority” and “Jehovah’s organization” teachings back to Russell. This search shows that Russell considered Jesus and his apostles (through the Bible) as the “only authority” for the church.

  • Share/Bookmark

Russell Questioned His Faith (RLCTR Blogspot Link)

The following statement has been made on a forum concerning Charles Taze Russell:

Russell questioned his faith at an early age and was uncomfortable with hell and predestination. He bounced around between Presbyterianism, Adventism, and Congregationalism before founding the movement that would become the JW’s.

Russell was right in questioning his faith in the teachings of man, especially those teachings that would depict the Creator as a fiendish demon as in such doctrines as the supposed indescribable eternal sufferings of billions of men, women, children, infants, etc., who died without believing in Jesus. Of course, as he pointed out, he thought that these teachings were actually a part of the Bible, and thus, believing this, his faith concerning the Bible also came into doubt. Once he learned that the Bible did not teach such blasphemous doctrines such as the eternal indescribable suffering of most of mankind, as well as the trinitarian dogma, and that it did teach that Christ died for all, he was right in taking up the Biblical stand for the truth concerning these matters.
For more information of the condition of the dead, hell, hades, sheol, lake of fire, eternal torment, etc., see:
For more information about the “ransom for all,” see:
For more information about the “trinity,” see:
Russell, however, learned the Biblical truths about hell, the condition of the dead, and about the trinity, as well as “the ransom for all,” from others who had become before him. His understanding of these matters did not originate from out of the blue, nor were they simply his own thoughts. It was the proper Biblical understand ing of these matters that led him to reaffirm his faith in the Bible, in the God of the Bible, and in Jesus as the Son of God who gave himself a ransom for all.
I doubt that Russell would have ever claimed to have been the founder of the Bible Students movement. At any rate, the Allegheny class of Bible Students existed before Russell became associated with N. H. Barbour, who was a “Second Adventist” (not to be confused with Seventh-Day Adventists).
Russell, of course, did not found an organization called “Jehovah’s Witnesses.” He never heard of such an organization; he did not believe in such an organization, and he preached against the formation of such an organization until the day he died. Russell refused to allow himself or the Watchtower Bible and Tract Society to become a “central authority” over the local congregations, although, individually, and as congregations, many of the Bible Students had come to view him as such.
  • Share/Bookmark

On “St. Peter’s Keys”

We are presenting the following from Pastor Russell’s Sermons because of the anti-sectarian statements that Russell made in this sermon, which show that he did not believe in an authoritarian sectarian organization as the “Jehovah’s Witnesses”. To help with searches, the names of Bible books have been expanded; we have also supplied the holy name at appropriate places. This sermon can be found in the book Pastor Russell’s Sermons, beginning on page 459.

“Upon this rock will I build My Church; and the gates of Hell [Hades, the grave] shall not prevail against it. And I will give unto thee the keys of the Kingdom of Heaven.” — Matthew 16:l8,19.

  • Share/Bookmark

Some Imaginative Misinformation Concerning Russell

Someone has just posted a page on a website directed toward “Jehovah’s Witnesses,” but which in reality is mostly concerning Charles Taze Russell. First, let us say that we have studied the works of Charles Russell very extensively for over forty years. (We are not with the JWs; we consider ourselves as associated with the Bible Students).

We have to state first that most of what is presented by the writer is from somebody’s imaginative mind.

  • Share/Bookmark

Reply to: “Charles Taze Russell founder of Jehovah’s Witnesses was a Mason”

This is in reply to a video that appears on YouTube entitled “Charles Taze Russell founder of Jehovah’s Witnesses was a Mason”.  Our replies on YouTube never seem to appear, so we are responding here.

We have already shown many times that Russell was not the founder of Jehovah’s Witnesses, nor did he ever believe in such an authoritarian organization. Although the video is directed toward “Jehovah’s Witnesses,” Russell himself was never a member of that organization, nor were his teachings the same as that organization.

See:
http://tinyurl.com/rl-russellfounder

Is Charles Taze Russell’s tomb a pyramid?

  • Share/Bookmark

Russell & Cracks in the Watch Tower

This is in response to “Finding Cracks in the Watch Tower” by Brianna Marecki

Since Charles Taze Russell did not believe in the beliefs of Jehovah’s Witnesses, and since he did not believe in such an organization as the Jehovah’s Witnesses, we believe that it is misleading to speak of Russell as the founder of that which he did not believe in. Nevertheless, since this idea is so generally assumed, and since most writers who write concerning this have never really studied Russell’s writings, we can see why authors keep repeating this idea.

  • Share/Bookmark

Parousia “Didn’t Happen” in 1874?

A website has posted the following:

1897 “Our Lord, the appointed King, is now present, since October 1874,” (Studies in the Scriptures, vol. 4, p. 621). Oops, didn’t happen. Present day JW’s said this was going to happen in 1914. When that didn’t occur, they said it did happen only it was an invisible return.

The first line of the page from which the above quote is taken as well as the tittle of the page lets the reader know that the page is about Charles Taze Russell. Thus, when reference is mad to the JWs, the evident assumption is that it is referring to Russell as allegedly representing the JWs.

  • Share/Bookmark

Russell — Founder of the JWs?

One has responded to our finding that  Russell was not the founder of the JWs, and several assertions have been made that are misleading, to say the least.

The claim is evidently that since Russell was the principal founder of the Watch Tower Bible and Tract Society, and since the JWs are now using that legal entity as their “legal instrument”, that this is supposed to mean that Charles Taze Russell was actually the founder of the Jehovah’s Witnesses organization. Of course, in reality, the legal instrument as Russell envisioned it, was not designed to be the legal instrument of an organization such as the “Jehovah’s Witnesses.” As he designed the Society, it was a legal entity for coordinating communication amongst the Bible Students and as  a service organization.

  • Share/Bookmark